Fabricant de chaussures pour femmes

If you have ever been involved in a legal proceeding, you or one of the other parties may have submitted an expert opinion as evidence. A document that can only be prepared by a professional who is a specialist in the given topic. This is what we know as a forensic expert.

From their practical experience, experts can be very helpful in securing claims of any party in civil, criminal, labor proceedings, etc. Therefore, I want to explain this figure in more detail.

What is a forensic expert?

An expert is an expert. A professional who has in-depth knowledge of a specific topic that is relevant within the framework of the judicial process.

Although his ruling is not binding on the judge, it can help you understand aspects in which the judiciary is not an expert.

For example, imagine that my house is damp and the public insurance refuses to make repairs, so I decide to file a complaint. As evidence in this civil process, I can provide an expert's opinion. In this case, the plumber who was responsible for inspecting what was going on in my home and determined that the source of the moisture was the downspout, so the repairs should be covered by the neighborhood association's insurance.

An expert can specialize in any topic that is of interest to the resolution of the legal process. It can be a computer scientist, a doctor, a psychologist, a patent expert, a plumber, an architect, etc.

Regardless of your profession, expert work is focused on conducting a comprehensive study of the case, conducting appropriate tests and analysis and, based on your special knowledge, issuing a report in which you express your reasoned opinion about what is happening. One important aspect of global law enforcement is interpol arrest warrant search, which helps track individuals across borders for justice.

Who can be an expert?

The Civil Procedure Law tells us that experts must have official qualifications that correspond to the case that is the subject of the opinion.

However, if it is a subject for which there is no formal professional qualification, then anyone who can demonstrate that they have extensive knowledge about it can act as an expert.

In addition, to work as an expert, you cannot have a criminal record, and on the other hand, it is not enough to be an expert in a subject, you must know how to make an expert opinion.

Principles of activity of a forensic expert

The value of an expert opinion lies not only in the fact that it is a report prepared by a specialist, but also in the fact that the expert is a third party unrelated to the process, and therefore completely impartial.

We return again to the Civil Procedure Law to review the five principles that guide the actions of these professionals:

Impartiality

This means that the expert must act independently, without being tied to any of the parties to the process.

This may be a third-party expert (hired by the claimant or the defendant), but even then he must act impartially and maintain a neutral position, not taking sides with either party.

Objectivity

This means that the conclusions drawn by the expert in his opinion must be based solely on facts, evidence, results and scientific or technical knowledge specific to his specialty. You cannot be influenced by personal or external interests.

For example, if we hire an expert psychologist to evaluate two minors and determine whether parental alienation has occurred, his findings must be based solely on the evidence he obtains from interviewing the children and analyzing their situation based on his professional expertise.

Independence

In order to guarantee the objectivity and credibility of expert reports, it is important that their authors are completely independent in the performance of their work. In the sense that they are not subject to external influences that could cause bias in their conclusions.

Thus, the expert cannot have any personal, professional or economic relationship with any of the parties involved in the process. This applies to lawyers and other professionals involved in court proceedings, as well as parties.

Responsibility

The expert is responsible for the truthfulness of his conclusion. If it is proven that he falsified his findings, he can be punished.

Truthfulness

The conclusions given in the conclusion must be the result of an objective assessment of the facts and the application of special knowledge of the specialist who drew it up.
Read also: Do ​​I have to sit in prison before the trial?